<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:25:45 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/"><rss:title>LegalBriefs</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-09T20:25:45Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/26/are-you-buying-a-business-or-a-battle.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/2/measures-66-67-create-jobs-in-vancouver.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/20/dont-choke-on-new-gag-rule-part-1.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/6/employment-poster-compliance-in-five-minutes-or-less.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/12/1/why-not-fire-an-employee-charged-with-a-felony.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/24/to-fireor-not-to-fire.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/4/choose-your-friends-wisely.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/22/is-your-employee-handbook-up-to-date.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/9/happy-labor-day-not-for-employers.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/8/7/texting-while-driving-not-just-for-kids-anymore.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/26/are-you-buying-a-business-or-a-battle.html"><rss:title>Are You Buying a Business or a Battle?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/26/are-you-buying-a-business-or-a-battle.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-02-27T00:24:51Z</dc:date><dc:subject>General Business</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/BusinessDeal000002401213XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267230402836" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>The local newspaper had a story Friday morning about former executives starting a new business that will compete with their former employer. Good for them! This is good news unless of course you are the party that just purchased the business that until recently employed these managers.</p>
<p>I know nothing about the purchase of the business, the resignation of the individuals or the launch of the new business. The legal implications of matters such as this are very fact specific. Without commenting on the current situation, there are lessons here for any potential purchaser of a business.</p>
<p>If you are purchasing a business, there are at least five ways you can avoid the loss of key employees that go on to compete with you. But first, let&rsquo;s consider two questions.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/2/measures-66-67-create-jobs-in-vancouver.html"><rss:title>Measures 66 &amp; 67 Create Jobs … in Vancouver</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/2/2/measures-66-67-create-jobs-in-vancouver.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-02-02T21:33:35Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Government</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/I-5%20Bridge%20000005425770%20200px.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1265146753028" alt="" /></span></span>It has started already. The tax measures approved by Oregon voters on January 26, 2010, Ballot Measures 66 &amp; 67, are beginning to create jobs in other states. More Oregon jobs will no doubt be lost.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/20/dont-choke-on-new-gag-rule-part-1.html"><rss:title>Don't Choke on New Gag Rule - Part 1</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/20/dont-choke-on-new-gag-rule-part-1.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-01-20T19:59:31Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/Gag%20000004270315XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264017592386" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Effective the start of this year, a new gag rule prohibits Oregon employers of all sizes from requiring employees to attend meetings where you share your religious or political opinions (code phrase for anti-union opinions). As will be discussed in a future LegalBrief, this law can cause more problems than you may realize.</p>
<p><strong>New Poster Required</strong></p>
<p>This new law, S.B. 519, also requires <strong><em>all </em></strong>Oregon employers to post a new notice for employees. The State of Oregon, for whatever reason, has chosen not to publish this new poster. This however does not absolve you from the statute&rsquo;s notice requirements. You must still display a notice.</p>
<p>We are looking out for you and created our own gag rule poster you can download and use at no charge.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/6/employment-poster-compliance-in-five-minutes-or-less.html"><rss:title>Employment Poster Compliance in Five Minutes or Less</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2010/1/6/employment-poster-compliance-in-five-minutes-or-less.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-01-06T17:26:27Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/minwagep.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1262807647251" alt="" /></span></span>With the new year comes new and revised employment poster requirements. Are your posters up-to-date? Are you properly displaying each and every poster you are required to display? Are you sure?</p>
<p>Maybe you purchased an all-in-one poster. Is it up-to-date? <strong>Hint:</strong>&nbsp;If it was printed more than just a few weeks ago, the answer is probably not.</p>
<p>For 8 years in a row, we are helping employers comply with your employment poster requirements at no charge.</p>
<p>You will find all 25 possible state and federal employment posters (English &amp; Spanish) assembled in one place. You will also find detailed instructions so you can determine which posters apply to your organization. Download and display our free posters and you are done. It is that easy.</p>
<p>Simply go to our <a href="http://www.thinkilg.com/employer-reports/2010-employment-posters.html">2010 Employment Posters</a> report to comply with your employment poster requirements in five minutes or less.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/12/1/why-not-fire-an-employee-charged-with-a-felony.html"><rss:title>Why Not Fire an Employee Charged with a Felony?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/12/1/why-not-fire-an-employee-charged-with-a-felony.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-12-01T21:31:53Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/Jail%20Cell%209934866XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1259704337989" alt="" /></span></span>Last week&rsquo;s LegalBrief suggested there is no need to fire an employee under investigation for criminal or professional misconduct if law enforcement or a state licensing board is going to solve the problem for you. The question was asked, however, why not fire an employee charged with a felony?]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/24/to-fireor-not-to-fire.html"><rss:title>To Fire…Or Not To Fire…</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/24/to-fireor-not-to-fire.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-11-24T18:11:52Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/SuitCuffs10273010XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1259086847164" alt="" /></span></span>An employee is under investigation for unprofessional or criminal conduct. Do you fire him?</p>
<p>As three clients have recently discovered, this question is not as easy as it seems.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/4/choose-your-friends-wisely.html"><rss:title>Choose Your “Friends” Wisely…</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/11/4/choose-your-friends-wisely.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-11-04T20:43:19Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/lb-images/Facebook.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1258735120631" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>We all have received them, emails wanting to be your &ldquo;friend&rdquo; on a social networking site. Someone you know, someone you barely know, someone you have never heard of &hellip; Rarely is a long lost friend renewing contact after many years.</p>
<p>What do you do when the friend request comes from an employee that works for you? What should you do?</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/22/is-your-employee-handbook-up-to-date.html"><rss:title>Is Your Employee Handbook Up To Date?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/22/is-your-employee-handbook-up-to-date.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-22T20:28:04Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/special-reports/employer-reports/SpiralNotebook%20px200.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1253651426760" alt="" /></span></span>In the last five years alone, we have made 100&rsquo;s of revisions to the employee handbooks we maintain for clients. These changes were made necessary by changes in state and federal laws, recent workplace problems, societal changes and changes in technology.</p>
<p>Have you kept up with these changes? Look at the handbook changes we have made and decide for yourself.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/9/happy-labor-day-not-for-employers.html"><rss:title>Happy Labor Day? . . . . Not for Employers</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/9/9/happy-labor-day-not-for-employers.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-10T00:05:29Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/Picnic%206064578XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1252596843633" alt="" /></span></span>Articles published in <em>The National Law Journal</em> yesterday morning and two days before highlight new laws, new enforcement activities and new employee lawsuit risks faced by American employers.</p>
<p>A just released <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Department of Labor (DOL) report concludes that workers lose more than $56.4 million per week as a result of employment and labor law violations.</p>
<p>This has the attention of the current administration. Now that it has been published in a national publication for lawyers, it also has the attention of plaintiff&rsquo;s employment attorneys. Soon, through the efforts of the mass media and plaintiff&rsquo;s attorneys, it will have the attention of your employees as well.</p>
<p>With four pro-labor executive orders from the new White House, a dramatic increase in the <span class="caps">DOL</span>&rsquo;s compliance and enforcement activities, a substantial increase in <span class="caps">DOL </span>wage and hour investigations and changes in the National Labor Relations Board, the rules you must comply with and the risk for mistakes are increasing dramatically.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/8/7/texting-while-driving-not-just-for-kids-anymore.html"><rss:title>Texting While Driving – Not Just for Kids Anymore</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.thinkilg.com/legalbriefs/2009/8/7/texting-while-driving-not-just-for-kids-anymore.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Alan Thayer</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-08-07T23:27:59Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Employment Law</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-float-left ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 200px;" src="http://www.thinkilg.com/storage/iStock_000009724050XSmall.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1249688323229" alt="" /></span></span>While driving down a major arterial, it was surprising to see a middle aged man in the car next to me looking at a cell phone with his arm at maximum extension trying to read the screen without glasses, texting a response and driving at the same time. Although much has been written about the dangers of teenagers texting while driving, evidently middle-aged people do the same, even without their reading glasses.</p>
<p>As an employer, there are steps you must take to prevent employee accidents while driving for your business and to prevent liability claims.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>